Interpretasi Ekonomi dalam Resepsi Pembaca pada Akun @Fiksimini di Twitter


  • Arini Vika Sari * Mail Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • (*) Corresponding Author
Keywords: Interpretation; Economy; Reception; Mini-Fiction; Twitter

Abstract

Twitter has become one of the forums used to introduce mini fiction literary works. One of the accounts that tries to bind Twitter users to be interested, like and participate in creating fictionmini literary works is the @fiksimini account. With different forms and characteristics, the @fiksimini account can make its followers and readers respond to topics that are thrown and cause economic interpretations. This study aims to analyze forms of economic interpretation that come from the reception of readers of the @fiksimini account on Twitter. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. The data source used was the @fiksimini account on Twitter during July 2019 to July 2020. Data collection was carried out using reading and note-taking techniques. The data collection instrument is the researcher himself (human instrument) using Iser's literary reception parameters. The data analysis technique in this study uses semantic and pragmatic equivalents in analyzing reader comments based on their economic interpretations. The data analysis stage was carried out in three stages, namely (1) word reduction; (2) data presentation; and (3) drawing conclusions. The results show that there are six forms of economic interpretation, namely the form of difficulty in getting a job by 30.1%, the form of being a guarantor by 11%, the form of caste differences by 11%, the form of running out of inventory by 7%, and the form of shares amounting to 3.1 %. The forms of economic interpretation contained in the @fiksimini account can provide an illustration that most Indonesian people are still far from a prosperous and prosperous life

References

Anderson, Bryan. 2017. “Tweeter-in-Chief: A Content Analysis of President Trump’s Tweeting Habits.” Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications 8(2): 36–47. http://www.cur.org/resources/students/undergraduate_journals/.

Creswell, John W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publications.

Damono. 2009. Sosiologi Sastra: Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Editum.

Farida, Nur, and Eggy Fajar Andalas. 2019. “REPRESENTASI KESENJANGAN SOSIAL-EKONOMI MASYARAKAT PESISIR DENGAN PERKOTAAN DALAM NOVEL GADIS PANTAI KARYA PRAMODYA ANANTA TOER.” KEMBARA Journal of Scientific Language Literature and Teaching 5(1): 74.

Fernández-Morera, Darío. 1981. “Cervantes and the Aesthetics of Reception.” Penn State University Press 18(4): 405–19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40246281.

Howitt-Dring, Holly. 2011. “Making Micro Meanings: Reading and Writing Microfiction.” Short Fiction in Theory and Practice 1(1): 47–58.

Iser, Wolfgang. 1972. “The Reading Process : A Phenomenological Approach.” The Johns Hopkins University Press 3(2): 279–99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/468316.

Kartikasari, Ratih, Novi Anoegrajekti, and Titik Maslikatin. 2014. “Realitas Sosial Dan Representasi Fiksimini Dalam Tinjauan Sosiologi Sastra.” Publika Budaya 2(1): 50–57.

Koval, Rachel. 2015. “The Long and Short of It: The Effects of Sudden Fiction in the Secondary English Classroom.” In Studies in Teaching 2015 Research Digest, ed. Leah P. McCoy. Winston-Salem: Wake Forest University Department of Education, 55–60.

Kurniawan, Heru. 2011. Sosiologi Sastra: Teori, Metode, Dan Aplikasi. Purwokerto: Graha Ilmu.

Musfeptial, NFN. 2017. “KONFLIK SOSIAL-EKONOMI DALAM NOVELBATAS ANTARA KEINGINAN DAN KENYATAAN KARYA AKMAL NASERY BASRAL.” Kandai 13(2): 193.

Ratna, N. K. 2013. Teori, Metode Dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rokib, Mohammad. 2012. “Gerak Komunitas Fiksimini Di Ruang Siber.” Jentera: Jurnal Kajian Sastra 1(2): 48–62.

Sari, Arini Vika, and Setiawan Teguh. 2022. “ANALISIS KOHERENSI DALAM TOPIK FIKSI MINI (Coherence Analysis in The Topic of Mini-Fiction).” Kandai 18(1): 22–43. http://ojs.badanbahasa.kemdikbud.go.id/jurnal/index.php/kandai.

Sari, Arini Vika, and Wiyatmi Wiyatmi. 2021. “Sexual Politics in Fiksimini: Analysis of Feminist Critical Discourse.” International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation (IJLLT) 4(2): 111–19. www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/ijllt.

Subagyo, P. Joko. 2006. Metode Penelitian Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ta’abudi, Drei Herba. 2018. “Model Fiksi Mini Maroko Dalam Antologi ‘Ha’Al-Hurriyah’ Karya Ar-Rihani.” LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra 3(1): 55.

Teeuw, A. 2017. Sastra Dan Ilmu Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Thompson, Martyn P. 1993. “Reception Theory and the Interpretation of Historical Meaning.” Wiley for Wesleyan University 32(3): 248–72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2505525.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Interpretasi Ekonomi dalam Resepsi Pembaca pada Akun @Fiksimini di Twitter

Article History
Published: 2022-12-27
Abstract View: 71 times
PDF Download: 126 times
Section
Articles